[quote]I do not want to become a scrutineer that is why the Kerrick series and the whole sports sedan movement Australia wide needs to have a fair dinkum tech officer funded by a per member levy across the 5 known sports sedan clubs. The series will employ that person for National rounds but we are not the only one that should be kicking the tin.
The only thing with regard to roll bars that has not been mentioned nor discussed is having one certified by an engineer. I am not the full bottle on this yet however I think if you design or have designed a cage by an engineer that is certified by an engineer then CAMS may accept this. For instance you can build a cage with crome moly (I think) if it comes with an engineers certificate.
Maybe Kerry had the cage in the Aston engineer certified????
So if anyone wants to do something not as per the CAMS ROPS rules maybe the answer is have it engineered and submit to CAMS. As for the cost......I doubt that you would see much change from $5,000 given the liability the engineer has to wear and the cost of his/her professional indemmnity insurance.
Phil, so if they are an “Engineer Certified” chassis, shouldn’t a quick call to CAMS to verify that both the BMW and the ASTON are certified. That would go a long way to put a few people’s minds at rest knowing that if they too want to spend the 5000.00 odd dollars to get the right to have a Larry bar.
Schedule J:
14.3 Alternative Designs: A safety cage structure not in compliance with Schedule J specifications may be
approved through the CAMS certification process. The static load tests detailed in FIA Appendix J, Article 277
shall apply. Approval in principle for any proposed design shall be sought from CAMS prior to commencement
of construction.
Whether this relates only to "14. Specifications - Single Seat Cars" needs to be clarified.
The way I read it, there is a minimum standard "Schedule J" that is there for someone to follow if they choose to build a car. If however you choose to deviate from the minimum standard, there is a process to be followed to ensure any additions to the minimum standard comply with CAMS requirements.
Perhaps Kerry has followed due process and made application through the correct channels. I don't know this, because I haven't asked him. I would suggest that a guy who has been engineering and racing Sports Sedans for as long as he has is probably smarter than most and knows what he wants in a car.
Regardless, your idea is a good one Abuilder! Let us know what CAMS have to say when you speak to them and ask them the question.
As a side issue, the two fastest cars in the country don't run a Larry Bar! Whilst I personally see merit in the safety/structural benefits of a Larry Bar, it's not the lack of one that is preventing most from getting within 5 seconds per lap of those guys.......