by sportsedan4 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:08 am
As an adjunct to Mr Boosts comments I have forwarded a copy of an opinion I forwarded to the ASSA Vic.I think the comments have some relivence to your debate.
Thank you to the people who contacted me with a view to discussing the points I made in the last news letter.
To move the debate forward I guess the first point to agree on, is recognition of the fact that change does need to take place , do we all see that we are in decline and every positive step should be considered to save our category.
Money would solve most issues when you discuss low grid numbers with National competitors, that said change is needed to drive it to a point where those that can afford the costs are motivated to spend.
Of course the problem of low grids, and the difficulty of getting people into our group as well as the inability to sell cars at anything there real value has a lot to do with many things other than the cost of actually running a car. I believe we need to attract the young racer as well as keep the older car builder in our mist.
With that in mind I believe the real problems are many but things can be done around the edges heading to a greater goal as an end game. As you know I believe we need parity, so my position begins there. Secondly the cars need to be built to a formula that is simple current in shape and straight ford to construct with a known end result.
An example of what I mean is included in this article. To make it really clear we need current cars that are easy to manufacture to a formula that creates a level playing field. We need two classes smaller engines and large engines, achieving similar if not the same out comes.
The introduction of Trans Am cars tells us that good cars can find there way into the category . I think there are six Trans Am cars here now. When buying these cars you should at least understand the end possibilities. The example that I won’t to draw attention to are the Rolex GT class run in America. These cars are very similar to ours in lots of ways, but clearly all costs are controlled as well as performance out comes. There web sight is www.grand-am.com and is well worth a good look.
I do understand that I’m not offering any real concrete solutions to the path forward, rather just general vague views which I hope will lead to productive discussion.
Having said all of the above , my answer to most of what I see the problem to be would be for some dedicated person to build 3 or 4 cars to a formula I have considered for some time .This would be cars with a predictable performance out come, more under car aero, more replicating the donor car, common but real race car running gear that would be reliable and easy to maintain etc.
The next step is to put the country's best go karter in a car and watch his mates come along to challenge.
The car that I envisage would cost about 10K per National round to run, and would be capable of running close to the front, with a path way to the front, in a second division if the thing really got going.
If I was 20 years young the project would be well on the way already. look forward to hearing your thoughts. John Gourlay.